Aidan Mayo vs Elmar Ejupovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Is second serve performance crucial for predicting match outcomes? Yes, Ejupovic has a slight advantage with a 48.49% win rate on second serves, compared to Mayo's 46.25% over the past six months.
• In recent return games, how do the players compare? Mayo shows stronger return capabilities, having won 46.92% of points on the opponent's second serve and 27.9% on the first serve, while Ejupovic's return percentages are 42.5% and 20.4% respectively.
• Under pressure, how do the players perform? Ejupovic demonstrates resilience, saving 64.24% of breakpoints, whereas Mayo saves only 47.11%.
• Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Ejupovic has won 59.68% of their matches, whereas Mayo has won 48.21%.
• What's their best surface? Ejupovic performs better on clay with a 56% win rate, while Mayo excels on hard courts with a 57% win rate.
• At which level has Ejupovic been more successful in the past year? Ejupovic thrives in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments (65% win rate at $10K events), while Mayo plays mostly in Challengers/ITF with a 47.92% success rate.
• Have they played against each other before? Yes, in their only direct matchup, Mayo defeated Ejupovic in straight sets (7-6(6) 7-6(5)) on a hard court.
• In high-pressure scenarios, like tiebreaks, Mayo shows dominance by winning both tiebreaks played against Ejupovic.
• Ejupovic has faced lower-ranked opponents on average (rank 402.92) than Mayo (rank 282.43) over the last 12 months.
• In deciding sets, who performs better? Ejupovic has the edge with a 57% win rate compared to Mayo's 36% over the past year.
• Regarding breakpoint opportunities, Mayo is significantly better, converting 29.81% compared to Ejupovic's 17.65%.

Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze this upcoming tennis clash between Ejupovic and Mayo, a few key factors merit consideration. Ejupovic's stronger second serve performance and breakpoint-saving ability suggest resilience under pressure. Moreover, Ejupovic has demonstrated overall consistency with a higher win percentage over the past year.

However, Mayo asserts dominance in return games and is notably more efficient at converting breakpoint opportunities. Furthermore, Mayo's previous victory over Ejupovic highlights their potential to capitalize on crucial points, especially under pressure scenarios like tiebreaks.

Although Ejupovic excels in deciding set performances, Mayo's superior experience gained by facing higher-ranked opponents could prove advantageous. Given these insights, Mayo appears to have a slight advantage heading into this match, making him the likely winner.